mediastudies 1

(abandoned substack post)

feel like the title of this post should be a quote about polaroid

I’ve always wanted to research and write a sprawling post about cameras, images, and I’ve always thought I would spend years and years on it. Why? well… I’ve always been interested in perception, how we perceive, how I am perceived. Could do a whole separate post about that, maybe try to weave some of that into here. Definitely doing a whole separate post about ads for sure.

tinseltown, picture palaces, cinemas

john bergers ways of seeing

There’s a 1972 documentary (available on youtube!)–  and a book

Camera changed what we see. Even changes paintings from before cameras

Reproducibility. Context

“Everything around the image is a part of its meaning” – confirms and consolidates

Images travel, meanings travel. Transmittable. Market value – a Leonardo sketch becomes like a relic in a shrine.

False mystery and false religiosity –

The nudes of European painting

To be naked vs to be nude- to be seen by others 

Nakedness Is a sight for those who are dressed

Nakedness is created in The Eye of the beholder

Shame in relation to the spectator

Beauty contest

Photographs as advertisement for myself 

polaroid camera:

The media environment I was born into

my relationship with cameras – I remember my family developing rolls of film, having photo albums, baby pictures

I remember the first few phones – we called them handphones in Singapore, I suppose you might call them cell phones – and the grainy pictures you could take with them

early days of facebook where people would upload dozens of chaotic photos of parties and so on

GTA

Anyone with a smartphone can vlog

// abandoned