{"id":4578,"date":"2012-03-05T03:33:31","date_gmt":"2012-03-04T19:33:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/blog\/?p=4578"},"modified":"2024-03-02T16:22:32","modified_gmt":"2024-03-02T16:22:32","slug":"the-art-of-overanalyzing-text-messages","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/2012\/03\/05\/the-art-of-overanalyzing-text-messages\/","title":{"rendered":"The Art Of Overanalyzing Text Messages"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.visakanv.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/hoebagels.jpg\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-4579\" title=\"hoebagels\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.visakanv.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/hoebagels.jpg?resize=500%2C375\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/hoebagels.jpg?w=500&amp;ssl=1 500w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/03\/hoebagels.jpg?resize=300%2C225&amp;ssl=1 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 15px; line-height: 28px;\">There have been many great books and articles written about the art of writing- how to write formal letters, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.esquire.com\/the-side\/feature\/women-advice\/how-to-write-a-love-letter\">how to write love letters<\/a> (I&#8217;m a big fan of Tom Chiarella), and even <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ojr.org\/ojr\/wiki\/writing\/\">how to write for the web<\/a>.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my tongue-in-cheek guide to writing artfully in SMS format, or on Facebook and Twitter. (If you&#8217;re going to ask me what the point of such a guide might be, this article probably isn&#8217;t for you. Disengage immediately!)<\/p>\n<p>I think anything worth doing is worth doing well- especially in the realm of writing, or expression in general.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Writing is about communication.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Face-to-face interaction is the richest form of communication. The amount of data transmitted is immense: tone of voice, inflections, \u00a0body language, facial expression, et cetera. How the message is transmitted speaks louder than the message itself.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tone matters.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>When you&#8217;re writing long handwritten letters, as was commonplace in <em>ye olde age<\/em>, you had the time and space to communicate your tone. There are all sorts of little hints, too- the style of the handwriting, the frequency of cancellations (if any), the addition of post scripts. If a letter was of great importance, you often wrote a draft before re-writing it. A letter of passion, on the other hand, might be more effective if it is written quickly, without any censorship or editing.<\/p>\n<p>Things have gotten a lot more succinct since then. We&#8217;ve traded dynamics for efficiency and convenience. It&#8217;s harder than ever before to express subtle emotions. But I believe it can be done. Hyper-analyse the world of SMSing? Challenge accepted!<\/p>\n<p><strong>Overall structure.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I personally have a habit of SMSing in fully formed sentences, or at least well-formed fragments. But not necessarily in perfect English. For some reason, an SMS written in perfect English can be rather intimidating. I think this is partially because SMSes are necessarily short, so &#8220;What are you doing tonight?&#8221; somehow seems a little menacing, or even demanding. That&#8217;s the sort of message I&#8217;d send a business partner, or maybe even a romantic interest. It puts a hint of pressure. Between friends, I prefer &#8220;whatcha doing tonight?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><strong>The <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Tilde\">tilde<\/a> as a subtle punctuation mark. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong>I wrote this entire blog post primarily because I wanted to talk about the tilde. Oftentimes I find that the regular question mark puts the recipient on the spot. Somehow, a question mark in a text message seems a little imposing. &#8220;What are you doing tonight?&#8221; is a question. The question demands an answer.<\/p>\n<p>Sometimes it can be interesting to send something like &#8220;what are you doing tonight&#8221; without the question mark. This, I find, allows the recipient to interpret the urgency of the message. \u00a0These sort of things, to me, are too important to leave to chance!<\/p>\n<p>Enter the tilde. According to Wikipedia, this is common usage in Japanese punctuation- so I think I got this idea from watching Anime and communicating with otaku. The tilde, in Japanese culture, is used:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<ul>\n<li>To indicate a long or drawn-out vowel (\u3067\u3059\u3088\u306d\u301c or \u3042\u301c\u301c\u301c), usually for comic or cute\u00a0effect<\/li>\n<li>To indicate or suggest that music is playing:\u00a0\u266c \u301c<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Eureka! That&#8217;s exactly it! There&#8217;s a certain chill-out vibe to it, isn&#8217;t there? As if a pleasant guitar chord was gently strummed as you were saying it. Consider the following examples:<\/p>\n<p>1: &#8220;I&#8217;m not angry!!!&#8221;<br \/>\n2: &#8220;I&#8217;m not angry.&#8221;<br \/>\n3: &#8220;I&#8217;m not angry&#8221;<br \/>\n4: &#8220;I&#8217;m not angry~&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s say you just received this from your girlfriend in response to &#8220;are you angry?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In the first three examples, it&#8217;s still entirely possible- and likely- that she&#8217;s actually still angry, but merely claiming that she isn&#8217;t. (If your girlfriend tells you she isn&#8217;t angry, it makes good sense to presume that she most probably still is.) The tilde is the only surefire escape- it adds a melodic, sing-song quality to the message. (If your girlfriend uses this, but she&#8217;s actually still angry- damn, son, your relationship is complicated.)<\/p>\n<p>Actually, if she really <em>isn&#8217;t<\/em> angry, she&#8217;ll probably elaborate further. The more succinct the response, the deeper the shithole you&#8217;ve dug yourself into. Good luck, bro.<\/p>\n<p>When used instead of a question mark, the tilde adds a drawl-like, lazy vibe to the tone which suggests that the question doesn&#8217;t really need to be answered.<\/p>\n<p>1: &#8220;Are you doing anything tonight?&#8221;<br \/>\n2: &#8220;Whatcha doing tonight!&#8221;<br \/>\n3: &#8220;whatcha doing tonight&#8221;<br \/>\n4: &#8220;whatcha doing tonight~&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In 1, the question mark, grammar and capitalization make for a rather formal effect- something you&#8217;d use with a business partner, or a person you tend to mind your p&#8217;s and q&#8217;s with. I think it works great in the early stages of courtship, when you want to imply a little bit of pressure on the other person. That&#8217;s flirting!<\/p>\n<p>In 2, the exclamation mark hints at enthusiasm. It&#8217;s a little bit flirty and a little bit fun. I often find that this is a good way to mask any political or subversive undertones- I&#8217;ve noticed that girls who are adept at bitching and underhand skullduggery tend to use exclamation marks extensively. It&#8217;s like a kind of poker-face- by being consistently chirpy, you can never tell when they&#8217;re pissed off, or preparing to emasculate you.<\/p>\n<p>3 is blah. Blah isn&#8217;t necessarily a bad thing. I think this is the standard mode between guy friends who&#8217;re too lazy to bother with punctuation. It can be quite ambiguous and neutral- it doesn&#8217;t really colour the tone of the message. I find that it tends to piggyback off the tone of the previous message. It also tends to imply that the sender is tired, or busy, or plain lazy.<\/p>\n<p>The effect of 4 is playful and fun. The sender is perhaps bored, and has a little too much free time. (This is usually me.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Never compromise on grammar. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong>You can cut out letters and words, mellow out capitalization and punctuation- but there is no excuse for improper grammar. Text messages with good grammar communicate that you are proficient at the language, but you&#8217;re choosing to be comfortable and lazy- like a pair of worn in jeans that fit just right.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t even want to give an example of bad grammar, even for demonstration purposes. (For the record, though- I don&#8217;t believe in being anal about the subtleties of grammar in the grey areas where it can go either way- for example, arguing between &#8220;Not one of us is&#8221; and &#8220;Not one of us are&#8221;. I personally prefer the former over the latter, but I&#8217;m not going to shoot anybody over it. English can be messy sometimes, and we gotta learn to roll with it.)<\/p>\n<p><strong>Hashtags and Memes. <\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><\/strong>This is some pretty high level stuff right here, and I like to pretend that I came up with it myself (although of course, I didn&#8217;t). Internet memes have become a wonderful way to communicate vast amounts of information in minimal characters. The Twitter hashtag (invented by Chris Messina) is a fantastic phenomenon. I love it because it allows for self-referencing, which allows you to add a lot of depth. Example:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Today is the day that I&#8217;m going to get ALL my work done! #delusionalthinking \u00a0#liesanddeceit&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>You could also use this to incorporate memes into your messages or status updates, for example:<\/p>\n<p>1: Watch the football game and make it to work on time? #challengeaccepted<br \/>\n2: omg, you made spaghetti for dinner? #megusta<br \/>\n3: I FINALLY DID IT! #successkid<br \/>\n4: She loves me, but she&#8217;s too afraid to say it. #truestory<\/p>\n<p>It can get a bit gimmicky if you try too hard (which I think I&#8217;m doing right now, because I can&#8217;t think of any good examples off the top of my head), but I think if you find the appropriate moment, it can be powerfully witty and expressive.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Abbreviations.\u00a0<\/strong>We often type lol when we&#8217;re not really laughing out loud. It&#8217;s a kind of tic, like ah, um, er, like, and so on. It simply serves to take the edge off of messages. &#8220;Im not angry lol&#8221;. It might seem stupid, but it&#8217;s convenient and it serves a purpose.<\/p>\n<p>I firmly believe that language has its own wisdom that is almost independent of its users (or more accurately, <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/emergence\">emergent<\/a> from its users), and that it&#8217;s frightfully efficient. We wouldn&#8217;t be using tics if they didn&#8217;t serve a purpose. That said, it&#8217;s very possible to over-use them, sometimes to the point where they become a substitute for actual thought. Check yourself. If you&#8217;re guilty, then you really ought to make an effort to cut it out. Else you just look stupid. Lol.<\/p>\n<p>Is there anything else I&#8217;ve left out? Share your thoughts and over-analysis! I know I&#8217;m not the only over-analyzer out there! Right? Right?<\/p>\n<p>#foreveralone<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There have been many great books and articles written about the art of writing- how to write formal letters, how to write love letters (I&#8217;m a big fan of Tom Chiarella), and even how to write for the web. Here&#8217;s my tongue-in-cheek guide to writing artfully in SMS format, or&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[603],"tags":[105,251,447],"class_list":["post-4578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-internet","tag-communication","tag-language","tag-social-media"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5gxNz-1bQ","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4578","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4578"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4578\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":14083,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4578\/revisions\/14083"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4578"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4578"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.visakanv.com\/archives\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4578"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}